Marianne Williamson's speech. Given on 1 July 2003
in Committee Room 6, House of Commons.
Introduction
by John McDonnell: I want now to introduce Marianne Williamson. People
will know Marianne from her writings and they will know of her from her
campaigning and also from the grass roots work that she has done around
provision of meals on wheels, that sort of thing. Many will also know
her from the Global Renaissance Alliance both in terms of the information
that is disseminated on the net and elsewhere and now, of course, because
of her work with Dennis Kucinich and the campaign for a Department of
Peace.
Marianne Williamson - The US Department of Peace initiative
Marianne began by thanking John McDonnell, MP and Diana Basterfield
for inviting her to speak at the meeting and then continued:
This past April, Congressman Dennis Kucinich of Ohio introduced legislation
in the U.S. House of Representatives that would establish a Cabinet-level
Department of Peace. Thousands of Americans have lobbied their congress
people to support this idea whose time has come.
The goal of the department would be to coordinate conflict-resolution
and peace-building efforts both domestically and internationally, providing
the president with a much broader array of options for handling violent
situations than are normally presented to him. Would we be so quick to
apply police and military solutions to our collective problems, if we
had peaceful alternatives deemed every bit as effective and sometimes
even more so?
"We will not solve the problems of the world," said Albert Einstein, "from
the same level of thinking we were at when we created them." More than
anything else, this new century demands new thinking: We must change our
materially based analyses of the world around us to include broader, more
multidimensional perspectives. People cause our social problems, and people
are more than merely material beings. To address the causal issues regarding
these problems, we must deal with more than material factors.
Violence is reflected in physical action, but it emanates from the human
heart. Any approach to the cessation of violence must involve emotional,
psychological and spiritual factors, if the approach is achieve more than
mere eradication of symptoms.
Social and political disease is similar in many ways to biological disease.
Decades ago, mainstream medical understanding was radically altered by
new realizations regarding health and healing. People began to realize
that an allopathic treatment of symptoms, while often the short-term solution
to a medical problem, does not necessarily create long-term healing. To
be healthy, we must do more than treat sickness; we must pro-actively
cultivate our health. Millions of Americans have turned to nutrition,
exercise and myriad forms of complementary healing techniques -- from
acupuncture to visualization -- to foster and maintain healthier bodies.
Surely, the best way to treat disease is to prevent it from occurring.
A holistic approach to healing does not represent an alternative model
to Western medicine, but a complementary model. It does not supplant traditional
medicine, but augments it. And so it is that we could use a complementary
approach to politics as well, one that recognizes not just the symptoms
of our problems, but their root causes. A Department of Peace would honour
the entirety of a human -- our emotional, psychological and spiritual
issues as well as merely our material ones. And in doing so, it would
address more deeply the entirety of our problems.
Especially after the tragedy of September 11, people have every right
to expect and demand whatever action necessary to create security for
our children and ourselves. But conscious Westerners also realize that
terrorism is a multidimensional problem requiring a set of multidimensional
solutions. It is not like an operable tumor, but more like a cancer that
has already metastasized to various parts of the body. We cannot just
zap the problem and expect it to disappear forever. We must heal it at
the level from which it emerged.
The Department of Peace in the US, and a Ministry for Peace in the UK,
would take a more human approach to healing our society, looking not merely
for ways we can destroy an enemy, but for more powerful ways to create
new friends. The pressing need of this century is that we find a way to
harness the power of a nonviolent heart.
Ultimately, the Peace Movement that will transform the world is not indigenous
to any particular nation, but to the species itself. There is a conviction
emerging from the depth of humanity at this time -- not just from Americans,
or the British, or anyone else. It represents a yearning for survival
itself, an absolute conviction that we must move beyond the stereotypical,
often outmoded thought forms that have defined so much of our governmental
functioning of the last few decades. We must evolve into a pro-active
embrace of the ways of peace, or we will be doomed to fall back time and
time again into the patterns of violence that now permeate world affairs.
We must say no to the idea that war is inevitable. And we must say so
with conviction.
In the words of philosopher Tiellard de Chardin, "One day, after we have
mastered the winds, the waves, the tides and gravity, we will harness
for God the energies of love. Then, for the second time in the history
of the world, man will have discovered fire." Just as terrorism is hatred
given political expression, peace is love given political expression.
We must wage peace with sophistication and commitment, just as we now
wage war. For the sake of our children, I pray that we will.
|